1. Reflect on how these songs contribute to making the community or natural world a better place and identify how the lyrics actions call others to action and can work to make positive change.
Both of these songs help to make the community or natural world a better place because they help to spread awareness on important issues. They both speak on issues faced by Indigenous people in the past and present. They show how unfair the conditions and treatment of Indigenous people are and how important it is to work towards changing this.
2. How do these songs represent that something is unfair? What is that “something”? Explain.
These songs represent how the treatment of Indigenous peoples is extremely unfair. These songs represent this unfairness through the meaningful lyrics found throughout the songs. Both songs show how it is unfair how not much is being done to change how Indigenous people are treated and how these issues are being swept under the rug.
3. What emotions do these songs generate for you? Compare your emotions between each song. Which one is more compelling? And why?
While listening to both of these songs, I felt many different emotions. The main two emotions that I felt were sadness and anger. I felt sad hearing about all that Indigenous people have to deal with and how even after many years, they still aren’t getting treated as they should. I also felt angry listening to the difference in the way the people in the songs were treated. The song “Wreck beach/Totem Park” was written from a white settlers perspective, so they were able to do things, such as publicly protest without facing many consequences. Whereas in the song “Caribou Ghosts & Untold Stories”, it is shown that the artist has to fight the issues they are facing, privately or they will face severe consequences. I think the song “Caribou Ghosts & Untold Stories” was more compelling. I believe this because the song is written from the perspective of an Indigenous woman, who has first hand experienced these situations. This made the song even more raw and devastating.
4. What is important to each of the singers? What is the message they are trying to convey?
It is important to both singers to shed light on the many issues faced by Indigenous citizens in the past and even currently in our present day. The song by the Zola’s, is written from a white settlers perspective on these issues and shows them discovering secrets that they hadn’t noticed previously. In the song by Simpson, it shows the perspective of someone who has dealt with these experiences her whole life. It also shows that the Zola’s are able to ignore the issues as they aren’t directly affected by them but Simpson doesn’t have that privilege. The message they are trying to convey is the importance of recognizing the issues faced by Indigenous people and how we need to take action to create change.
5. Using one of your similarities and differences (not the example one given), discuss in a short paragraph (6-10 sentences) how music can convey different perspectives on the same cause?
There are many lyrics from both songs that can be used to demonstrate powerful similarities and differences in the songs. The lyrics that I am choosing are “But we drove around the edge of them and went on with our lives.” and “Catharsis is still elusive, we’ll save that for another day.” Both of these quotes show how people may want to avoid issues such as the treatment of Indigenous people, as they believe that finding a solution for the unjust treatment would prove to be too challenging. They decide to move on as they feel like no change can be made. But they also demonstrate the difference that one group is able to completely move on from the issue, but the other group is only able to do this temporarily. The Zola’s are able to forget about what they learned as the issue isn’t something that they are actively faced with. In the song written by Simpson, she shows how she is only able to ignore the problem for the day as it is something that is impossible for her to ignore, as it constantly surrounds her. This shows different perspectives as one artist hasn’t experienced any of these things, but the other artist has.