This project had been one of my better pieces of work, i believe that i had demonstrated good understanding of the topic and i was able to analyze the information provided well. During this assignment i believe that my inquiry and evidence skills had been very effective as when i was reading the sources i was able to not only inquire on surface level implications of actions and events but also connect it to a deeper level of understanding. I was able to put myself in the perspective of those who may have been effected by the laws, reading in between the lines. this would effect my evidence side of this assignment as well as because i had a multileveled understanding of the topic i was able to throughly provide evidence and support my point. The only criticism that i have for my Inquiry and Evidence skills in this particular project would be that i could have gone into more depth about how exactly kings would benefit most from laws in the 5th question.

regarding my capabilities of analysis and the ability to use information effectively i believe that i am good at internalizing information and truly understanding how things were. i can also focus in on certain points of interest when reading that i could use in my assignments. i am able to pick out useful information and form it into well put together sentences as well as include implications that are not written. This makes it so that when i am working properly my paragraphs go into depth on the topics. i can explain things fully in a compressed form as well which was a recent development in my work. Some times however i don’t produce my usual quality of work due to various factors. this may be because of confusion or failure to understand the topic, this results in a bad end product for example my most recent mesopotamia timeline. Something i need to work on would be consistency in this skill and equal portioning of introducing factors, events, etc and explaining them.