To Truley understand the characters in the Crucible and the reasons for their behavior, one only has to use Kollberg’s moral perceptions as an explanation to describe in detail their motivations for doing what they do. This essay will look at three different moral perceptions that develop chronologically over time. They are pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional. All three motivate people to behave in certain ways. Often, all three or two of the three receptions are factors in behavior. This essay will explain, define, and demonstrate Kollbergs moral perceptions influence on characters. 

There are many examples within the English literature that illustrate that there are pre conventional characters in the crucible. To start with Betty Parris is egocentric. Parris said, “will you wake.”  In this situation Betty is more focused on her own safety and avoiding punishment. This is motivated by her own anxiety and instinct for survival. She prioritizes her own safety by avoiding consequences instead of considering the wider consequences of her actions. She lays in bed pretending to be ill so Reverend Parris does not find out the truth. This causes Betty to become self-centered and not consider how her actions might influence her in the future. Moving onto Ann Putnam, she illustrated desperate behavior. Specifically, when Reverend Hale explained to Ann that “It is a formidable sin to conjure up the dead.” Ann Putnam illustrated signs of desperateness because she wanted her daughter to use witchcraft to communicate with her dead children. Her actions were self-interested in wanting to explain her pain and loss. By using her daughter, she ignores the consequences of her behavior, concentrating instead on reliving her own pain and identifying someone or something to blame. Finally, Abaigail Williams is threatening. Abigail shows this when mentioning to Mary Warrener “I can make you wish you had never see the sun go down.” Abigail realizes that if any of the girls speak up and expose the truth, she might face consequences for her involvement in the false claims. Abigail intimidates Mary to prevent her from revealing the truth, using fear tactics to assert her dominance. This situation shows that Abigail is a controlling and intimidating character as she attempts to safeguard herself and her standing in the group so that she avoids all punishment. To conclude there are many pre conventional characters in the crucible including Betty Parris, Ann Putnam and Abigail Willams that show examples of their behavior and hoe they behave in a way to get a reward and avoid punishment   

There are many conventional characters found in the crucible; conventional behavior refers to people behaving in a way that allows them to be accepted into a group. To begin with, Mary Warren is fearful. She shows this fear when saying “I’ll never hurt you more.” Marry Warren was lying in the court leaving her in fear and discomfort, although avoiding trouble with Abigail.  Mary shows that she is scared but does not want to upset anyone, leading her to go against her own will. This shows her desire to fit in with others and put her own beliefs to the side. Next, Betty Parris is manipulative. This is illustrated when Betty explained “[she] saw Alice Burron with the devil.” For Betty to feel like she fit into the group and avoid punishment she followed the crowd. She heard all the girls confess and thought to do the same for herself. Betty provides a great example of being manipulated by avoiding trouble, then telling the truth. She shows that she is more focused on prioritizing fitting in. Lastly, Reverend Parris indicated that he is very self-interested. Specifically, when he explained “[He] would postpone those hangings for a time.”  This is an example that he does not care about justice in this situation but about his position in the community and how his actions may affect others and his image. His desire to delay the hangings illustrates his focus on how he thinks others may react. In conclusion, the conventional behavior of all these characters demonstrates the same actions in ways that allow them to be accepted into a group and go behind their beliefs.  

There are characters in the Crucible that are post conventional. Post-conventional characters are confident in what they believe, with no reward, punishment of group acceptance is needed.  First, John Hale is frustrated.  This is demonstrated when John Hale proclaimed, “[He] quit the court.”  John Hale thought it was the right thing to leave, so he did just that. He feels frustrated as he understands that the court is biased and that innocent individuals are suffering consequences. Because the trial is unjust, he wants to resign. This response relies on his emotions instead of a strong ethical obligation. Moreover, Elizabeth proctor is loyal. This is show when she explains that “[Her] husband is a goodly man.” Elisbeth demonstrates her loyalty, because despite everything John Proctor has done, she still believes he possesses some goodness and defends him. Elizabeth is supporting her husband, John Proctor, despite being aware that his relationship with Abigail demonstrates a strong loyalty to her husband, regardless of the challenges they are experiencing. Elizabeth’s behaviors are motivated by her personal connections and a wish to safeguard her family. Her focus is keeping her relationship with John Proctor. At last, Giles is determined. For example, when he states “My proof is there” he presents evidence that saves his wife from false accusations of witchcraft stated by Thomas Putnam. His statement reflects a strong determination to stand by his beliefs, even in the face of getting accused. This determination, however, is driven by protecting his loved ones and making sure that he is not caught up in the wrongs of the trials. Overall, this illustrates that post-conventional characters are confident in what they believe, with no reward, punishment of group acceptance is needed including characters from the Crucible such as John Hale, Eliabeth proctor and Giles. 

In summary, applying Kohlberg’s stages of moral development offers a strong perspective for analyzing the characters in The Crucible and the reasons for their behaviors. This essay examined the three levels of moral development, pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional. And how these levels influence the actions and choices of main characters in the play. Characters such as Betty Parris, Ann Putnam, and Abigail Williams illustrate pre-conventional behavior by acting in self-interest to avoid punishment and gain a reward or benefits. In the meantime, characters like Mary Warren and Reverend Parris show a typical behavior, driven by the need to conform to the group and fit in. Ultimately, individuals such as John Hale, Elizabeth Proctor, and Giles show post-conventional behavior by their actions and dedication to their principles, even in difficult situations. Examining the characters using Kohlberg’s stages of moral development provides a better understanding of the motivations behind the events that occur in the Crucible. 

Core competency Self Assessment

Communication

This year, so far I have been working on communication, especially when it comes to my project. As this is my first piece of clothing I have ever made it have it has lead me to a lot of questions, which I’ve gotten a lot of support and answers from my peers and teachers. Having these questions has left me with improving my communication skills especially with my peers, as we try to figure out the problems together forming friendships.

These are the pajama shorts that I made, with a stretchy waist band and lace to add the final touch.

Part One

Culture 35%, Friends 20%, Family 15%, Humor 15%, Music 15%

c u l t u t r e 

I value culture 35% because that’s who I am. Culture is a big part of my life, all my beliefs and values come from my culture. It’s taught me to put others first.

f r i e n d s 

friends play an important part in my life; they support me no matter what and laugh with me when I have a good time

o l d e r   s i s t e r 

Being an older sister I value 15% because my brother is so important to me. He’s the person I will laugh with for hours and I’ll always be there for him. It’s nice to know that’s I’ll always have a sibling by my side. 

h u m o r 

I think humor  of laughter is a valuable quality.   Humor is a way for me to express myself and show my personality.  Plus, laughing is just plain fun!

m u s i c 

Music is a way for me to express myself and connect with others. It can help me to relax and unwind after a long day, or it can energize me and get me pumped up. Music is a universal language that can bring people together, and it can help me to feel more connected to the world around me. Whether I’m listening to my favorite songs or playing an instrument, music is an important part of my life that I like.

Part 2

A) How was this different than your shape in part 1?  

The body outline was a different structure to the circle. It was a lot hated to evenly mark the percentages and was a lot more accurate on the circle.

B) How were you able to calculate your identities accurately?

 I found this the hardest part of the assignment, I value each thing 100% and it was hard to choose the right numbers. Rather than trying to calculate it, I focused on exposing and understanding the different parts of myself and what makes me.  When it came to choosing the numbers I chose what makes me me and went off of that.

C) What shapes would you recommend others for this project? Why?  

I would recommend a star if you wanted to use all even numbers. Or you could use other shapes like a rectangle, which would be easier and more accurate to split.